Webfrontend #811

Userfeedback #808: werke

Creation: change contribution gui

Added by Thomas Mielke almost 3 years ago. Updated 5 months ago.

Status:ErledigtStart date:
Priority:DringendDue date:
Assignee:Thomas Mielke% Done:

100%

Category:-Estimated time:1.50 h
Target version:Repertoire 2) Testing phase II

Description

Split into:

  • Copyright
    • artists, simple deform sequence
    • type: composition/lyric (tags)
    • (collecting society)
  • Neighbouring Rights
    • artists, simple deform sequence
    • roles: ... (tags)
    • collecting society

Related issues

Related to collecting_society - Userfeedback #764: UX Auswahl Contribution Neu
Related to collecting_society - Konzept #850: Can we drop the relation between contributions and roles? Erledigt
Related to collecting_society - Webfrontend #715: Creation: change tariff category gui Erledigt
Related to collecting_society - Webfrontend #716: Creation: change content gui Erledigt
Related to collecting_society - Webfrontend #717: Creation: change original gui Erledigt
Related to collecting_society - Userfeedback #766: VG-Name in Contribution List Neu
Related to collecting_society - Webfrontend #817: default collecting society in creation contribution Neu
Blocks collecting_society - Webfrontend #823: missing details in show creation Neu

History

#1 Updated by Thomas Mielke almost 3 years ago

#2 Updated by Thomas Mielke over 2 years ago

  • Related to Konzept #850: Can we drop the relation between contributions and roles? added

#3 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

  • Subject changed from contributions based on artist rather than role to implement creation contribution role as n:1 relation to artists
  • Estimated time set to 1.00

#4 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

  • Subject changed from implement creation contribution role as n:1 relation to artists to Creation: change contribution gui

implement creation contribution role as n:1 relation to artists

#5 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

#6 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

#7 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

#8 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Estimated time changed from 1.00 to 1.50

#9 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

#10 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

#11 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

#12 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to Hoch

#13 Updated by Alexander Blum over 2 years ago

  • Priority changed from Hoch to Dringend

#15 Updated by Thomas Mielke over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Neu to In Bearbeitung
  • Assignee set to Thomas Mielke

#16 Updated by Thomas Mielke over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from In Bearbeitung to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from Thomas Mielke to Alexander Blum

We need to re-think this:

The copyright collecting society makes only sense as a property of a solo artist and shouldn't be arbitrarily changed on contribution level. We already have a per-creation selection of the collecting society responsible for collection on the "Areas of Exploitation" tab, the earnings side.

On the expenses side, when it comes to distribute the money among the creators, the contribution is important: here we see which collecting society is responsible for paying the author. It may depend on mutual agreements whether or not the money is transferred.

Authors may be members of several collecting societies. We should point out that we only need a primary ollecting society here over which the author wishes to handle the revenue transfer.

#17 Updated by Thomas Mielke over 2 years ago

  • Related to Webfrontend #817: default collecting society in creation contribution added

#18 Updated by Thomas Mielke over 2 years ago

#19 Updated by Thomas Mielke over 2 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Alexander Blum to Thomas Mielke

#20 Updated by Alexander Blum almost 2 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2) Testing phase II to Repertoire 2) Testing phase II

#21 Updated by Alexander Blum 5 months ago

this is done, isn't it?

#22 Updated by Thomas Mielke 5 months ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Erledigt

yes

#23 Updated by Thomas Mielke 5 months ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Also available in: Atom PDF